Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
Friday, December 25, 2015
Friday, December 18, 2015
Bishop Hill Book Signing
I was there this year as
chauffeur and helper for Lilly Setterdahl. She held a book signing in Bishop
Hill’s new Welcome
Center for her 19th
book, Second Love After 50.
We had perfect weather, as in
no snow, for our afternoon. Lilly spent two hours talking to people and selling
her new book as well as copies of her other books. I walked the streets
visiting old friends and trying to take in all the “new” the village had to
offer.
Lilly and I couldn’t stay for
the evening’s light show; we had to get back to the Quad Cities. I had to be
content with my memories of years past when I spent many chilly hours in the
Blacksmith Shop stoking the wood-burning stoves, eating cookies, and drinking
the spiced cider. (I would occasionally try some homemade glögg just to see how
much pain I could endure.)
From age 9 on my boys and
their friends had the run of the village when they weren’t in service as Tomtes
and St. Lucia
girls. They were free ranging before we had that term.
I dropped Lilly and her gear
off in East Moline and had a lot to think about
as I made my way across the river to Davenport .
I passed a lot of houses decorated for the season, some quite lavishly, but
none had the lovely warm glow of the hundreds of candles that filled my memory.
Friday, December 11, 2015
Jan Brett
Somewhere along the line, I
missed out on the phenomenon of children’s literature that is Jan Brett. That
omission was rectified when I met up with her on a recent sunny Sunday morning
at the main branch of the Davenport Public Library.
I should say I met up with
her and her entourage. Brett was accompanied by: her husband, a musician in the
Boston Symphony; a pair of live Bantam chickens (I’m going to guess that the
egg she held up was just the shell); two large fuzzy costumed creatures (one of
which had to be a hedgehog); a staff of 3 or 4 people from Iowa City’s Prairie
Lights bookstore (there to sell books); and a full compliment of local
librarians brought in for extra duty.
Brett’s custom decorated tour
bus rolled into Davenport
as part of the tour for her latest book, The
Turnip, a lavishly illustrated children’s picture book based on a Russian
folktale.
I got there soon after the
doors opened and picked up a nice assortment of promotional handouts. I readily
accepted everything for the purpose of marketing research. My blue mitten
indicated what group I was assigned to if I bought a book and wanted it signed.
Blue turned out to be the second of four groups. That was an impressive amount
of organization. When I saw the length of the line waiting to buy books—I knew
it was needed. The tour bus, a crowd of over four hundred people: Brett had indeed
achieved “rock star” status.
Brett’s thirty minute talk
was part reading and part drawing lesson. I was impressed that she never talked
down to the kids in the audience. She used scientific names and terminology to
describe the chickens and explain the differences between male and female.
Scientific and G-rated. The lesson went well over the top in terms of
helpfulness and gentle encouragement for everyone to try their hand at drawing.
Friday, December 4, 2015
POV Revisited (Again)
I finished Kate Atkinson’s When Will There Be Good News. I’m
impressed with how well she handled all the interconnected story lines. More
than the story lines, she fully fleshed out the characters—warts and all.
Rereading it made me realize
(again) that I did the right thing by limiting my novel to one main POV. I had
given each of my four POV characters a good beginning, but having two of them
suddenly become quiet after a pivotal scene had been a mistake. Atkinson had her
three main POV characters speaking to the reader till the very end. They were
allowed plenty of room to wrap up their subplots—for the most part. Some loose
threads lingered. A few mysteries remained. Quite enough for her next work in
the series.
Her attitude about the lingering
mysteries of life:
“Everywhere you looked, there was unfinished business
and unanswered questions…
…Everything would remain a mystery. Which meant, if
you thought about it, that you should try and clear everything up as much as
you could while you were still alive. Find the answers, solve the mysteries, be
a good detective. Be a crusader.”
I think “try” is the
operative word here. So, if I try this again, having multiple POVs, I’ll have a
great example to fall back on. Another case where a writer doesn’t have to play
by the strict rules of a genre to succeed.
Monday, November 30, 2015
POV Revisited
I went out of town for
Thanksgiving. Before I left, I was writing what I thought would be my weekly
blog post only to discover (too late) that I was really writing a column.
Hence—the lateness of this post.
While away, I started
rereading Kate Atkinson’s When Will There
Be Good News. This turned out to be a great thing. I had forgotten all
about the structure she chose to tell her story—stories.
Atkinson has whole chapters
dedicated to separate points of view, POVs. There are four: a doctor, the lone
survivor of 30-year-old crime; a veteran who was police and is now a private
detective; a currant police detective with marriage issues; and a 16-year-old
orphan with the worst kind of brother.
Each person receives ample
time to reveal background, frame current conflicts, and then gets sent on their
way. I presume they will all eventually meet up with each other.
I’m only halfway and there’s
been a train wreck, the doctor’s husband is lying about her whereabouts, nasty
thugs are looking for the brother, and the two detectives have more in common
than their professions.
I have to finish so I can see
how Atkinson makes all this come together. (My memory is a little murky… Well,
a lot murky.)
It’s an academic point for
me, since I’ve already taken out the multiple POVs from my novel. Let’s face it;
I didn’t have this much drama going on. My story is set in—Bishop Hill , IL —the
center of the grand American Midwest.
Donald Harstad can pull off demonic
cults and foreign terrorists in northeast Iowa . I’m only managing a missing painting
and the motives behind the heroes and villains searching for it.
I will endeavor not to be
late with the next post.
Friday, November 20, 2015
Start the Launch Party
When I enrolled in the Midwest Writing Center ’s
marketing workshop series lead by Jodie Toohey, the Wordsy Woman, I thought I
knew a little something about promotion, sales, and social media presence. The
operative word here is “little.”
After the six sessions of
intensive presentations and HOMEWORK I can positively say, “I now know a lot more.”
Before, I would have had my
launch party and then…?
I would have been hard
pressed to have any kind of plan of action outside a press release.
Knowing what to do next. Who
to talk to about reviews. Where to investment my time and money. How to handle
all the things that needed some preparation and lead time to make happen in an
organized and beneficial manner. When I should pace myself and think
realistically about just what I could do to connect to my potential readers.
These topics were well covered over the course of two months.
“Realism” is another
operative word. I got a dose of that as I completed my writing assignments,
filled out my worksheets and charts, and thought about how I’d answer probing
questions about my target reader.
I came away with resources to
tap into and ideas to try. I plan to budget, schedule, and keep in touch. There
is a wealth of information out there and it’s good not to have to navigate those
waters alone.
The best part: a book launch
still starts with a PARTY!
Launch v. > (launch into) begin (an enterprise) or introduce (a new product). From
the OED
Party n. (pl.
parties) 1. a social gathering of invited guests, typically involving eating,
drinking, and entertainment. Also from the OED
I plan to serve meatballs at mine.
I plan to serve meatballs at mine.
Friday, November 13, 2015
Thought for the day:
I went to the Figge for the
Thursday night opening reception for Wit
+ Whimsy The Photographs of Kenneth
Josephson. I knew nothing about Mr. Josephson outside of seeing a few
photos that had been included in a prior Figge exhibit. I remembered his work
being fun and inventive. I liked how he took time to see the odd little things
of our everyday life and transform them into Art by shifting the focus of the
image ever so slightly. Tire skid marks on a paved road become calligraphy. Distorted
lane markings on melted asphalt seen through a mat become a modernistic
print. I looked forward to experiencing
more of his unique way of viewing the world.
The 84-year-old photographer
spoke sparingly and let an overview of his work do the talking for him. It was
quite eloquent. He only needed to add clarification here and there, to explain
about lighting, timing, and the lucky gifts that occasionally befell the
patient observer with a 35mm camera loaded with film.
His last story of the evening
was about his trip over from Iowa City .
It seems his car passed through one of our small Iowa towns, one no bigger than a few buildings
around an intersection, and something caught his eye. A multitude of cracks in
the road had been repaired and what would look like random lines of tar to most
of us appeared like an exotic alphabet to him. He had the car stop so he could
take a photo.
I can appreciate that level
of spontaneity.
I have been known to pull up
short and walk back to take a picture of spilled paint on a London sidewalk. The neat thing: pigeons had
walked through the wet paint and left trails of intersecting birdie footprints.
So much fun. That probably set off my own series of pigeon photos. (The benefit
of digital photography—it’s so easy to take and store all the shots you may
never get back to. As long as the memory space holds out, I’m good.)
The point I’m trying to make
is to stay open to new uses for the familiar. If it works for the visual image,
it’s up to us writers to make it work for our written words.
Friday, November 6, 2015
NaNoWriMo 2015
No one can ever accuse me of
being too fast. I prefer to think of myself as the slow-and-steady kind who
gets things right in the end. But still, it can be annoying.
The case in point: I’m going
through my manuscript to check out how I’ve used shifts in the POV, point of
view.
Shifting the POV is
acceptable if it is clearly defined at the beginning of chapters or otherwise
marked. This advice can be found in Writing
Mysteries edited by Sue Grafton. It is used effectively in The Art Forger by B. A. Shapiro and S is for Silence by Grafton.
I used different POVs to
enable three secondary characters to present themselves to the reader and share
their thoughts and experiences. This bothered some, not all, of my Beta
readers.
Writers need good feedback on
their stories & manuscripts. You can’t fix the problems until you know what
they are.
However, a writer has to
acknowledge that a problem exists before steps can be taken to fix things up.
This second step is very
hard. I’ve tried to be open to input and still I’ve come face to face with the
issue of acceptance.
By using multiple POVs, I
thought I was adding depth and dimension. I thought I was building dramatic
tension. I thought I was on par with what I’d seen from other writers.
I finally went back to my
manuscript and took a fresh look at what I had done and how it had turned out.
I asked myself, “How much value does this really
add?”
The answer, “Perhaps, not
enough to keep it as is.”
So, here I am at the
beginning of NaNoWriMo 2015 looking at some significant rewrites and
alterations.
I don’t think it will result
in major changes. In fact, I suspect my protagonist will be the clear
beneficiary. And she needs help to come across as strong and capable in the end.
The job will be to eliminate
the secondary POVs and integrate the character info into other scenes. I can do
that without losing much. I will miss the word count more than anything. But
finding strength in other places should make it worthwhile.
I wish I could have come to
this point sooner. Maybe it is still part of my learning process. It just feels
a little old sometimes.
Friday, October 30, 2015
Theme: Love
I’ve had to tell people on a
few occasions that my novel is not a romance. Not a big deal. There is no
explicit anything to worry anyone. It’s all safely “cozy.”
But I do think about the
theme of Love in terms of attraction between characters in a few situations.
For instance:
·
I explore how two
people can know each—not like each other—but maybe become open to a change if
the situation allows.
·
I’ve got a couple
who, for the best of reasons, make some unconventional choices.
·
I’ve gone briefly
into the past for another couple and tried to tie their romantic stories to the
present.
Taken together, I’m hoping
these subplots will combine to make things interesting.
Another reason to spend my time
on romance—I’ve been thinking about family weddings. One occurred recently and
the other will happen in the near future.
I saved a wonderful newspaper
column by Dr. Wallace who wrote in response to a young person’s question about
defining the word “love.”
Dr. Wallace quoted Haim
Ginnott:
“Love is not just a feeling and passion. Love is a
system of attitudes and a series of acts, which engender growth and enhance
life for both lover and beloved.
“Romantic love is often blind: It acknowledges the
strength but does not see the weakness in the beloved. In contrast, mature love
accepts the strength without rejecting the weakness. In mature love, neither
boy nor girl tries to exploit or possess the other. Each belongs to himself.
“Such love gives the freedom to unfold and to become
one’s best self. Such love is also a commitment to stay in the relationship and
attempt to work out difficulties, even in times of anger and agony.”
I saved this clipping for
years. To its call for commitment and grace, I would add the following
ingredients to a happy marriage:
·
A sense of humor
·
Extra patience
·
And a big dose of
kindness
I find all these things to be
useful and true on a daily basis.
Friday, October 23, 2015
Going To Market
Book marketing workshop last Wednesday night at the Midwest Writing Center. Presented by Jodie Toohey author of Taming the Twisted.
Guest speaker was David W. Dorris author of Life Is Too Short: Life Is What We Make It.
Friday, October 16, 2015
Not About Jansson
A reader asked questions
about Erik Jansson. She thought I should add more info about him. Background
stuff I suppose. Place him in the context of my story a little better.
It took a couple of days of
rumination but the answer is no, I only want the bare minimum of info about
Jansson.
He’s important to the
founding of Bishop Hill.
He’s important to, well, the
mystery of my mystery.
He’s not what the book is about.
My book is about descendants
of the original Colonists and the choices they have to make about staying in
Bishop Hill, how they preserve what remains of the Colony, and how they relate
to their heritage.
My book is not a history lesson. Others are far
better qualified than I and have done excellent jobs of recording the real
story of Jansson, the Swedish immigration, and Bishop Hill.
My work is fiction. I’ve used the few facts I know about
Erik Jansson and Olof Krans fictitiously.
Specifically, I have created a
coming-of-age story about one young descendant in particular. She is faced with
a mystery about a Krans painting, which may or may not exist. She has obstacles,
both personal and professional, to deal with. At age twenty-two, she’s a “new
adult” who has to make some adult decisions.
So, I will reread my
manuscript and see what I can do, but I don’t intend to put in any more info on
Jansson than what suits my purpose.
I’ll acknowledge right now
that it probably won’t be enough for some people. Great. Those who want to
learn more, and I encourage learning more, are free to continue their journey
to Bishop Hill, either by further reading or an actual visit. There’s a lot out
there and many people who will help you along your way.
Friday, October 9, 2015
Farewell to the Queried Agent
Dear Queried Agent,
I sent you my query letter months ago. I know you’re busy. You get hundreds, thousands of queries every
day. I get it. I knew getting any kind of response was bucking the odds. That’s
why I was grateful for the one email I did get.
In 2013, the MWC had then
agent Jen Karsbaek come to the David R. Collins Writers’ Conference. I paid $25
to have her hear my pitch. It was, like, my second pitch, so it wasn’t very
smooth. However, it was enough for her to request 40 pages of my manuscript. Nice.
She responded in a timely
fashion and offered some pertinent advice for a rewrite. Also nice.
I followed her advice—not in
timely fashion—and when it came time to resubmit the pages I discovered she was
no longer an agent.
Sad, but I followed
directions and sent my pages along with an explanation to the recommended agent
taking over her caseload.
No response.
In the meantime, I don’t have
an agent, but I have found an interested publisher.
What to do?
Be proactive.
I checked out a library copy
of How
To Be Your Own Literary Agent by Richard Curtis. The info was old by 12
years and counting, but at this point any
info was greatly appreciated. I made myself slog through to glean whatever
crumbs I could.
On a more current front, through
David Brin and Google+, I got handed a nice list of websites for authors. Many
of those appear to be business oriented.
I’m not down and out.
I’ve got even more reading to
do.
Here are 120 great websites
for authors:
Friday, October 2, 2015
Something New
I’ve spent the last few days trying
to learn something new; adding, as it were, to my punctuation skill set, the … ellipsis.
Defined in the OED as:
Ellipsis • n. (pl.
ellipses) the omission of words from speech or writing. A set of dots
indicating such an omission.
It appears I’ve used this
symbol a lot in my dialog. I wanted to indicate halting pauses … as well as
omitted words. People talk like that … I know I do. I pause … because I’m
trying to remember what point I was going to make. (I’d be more upset if this
wasn’t already a lifelong trait.)
Like I said, I’ve liberally
sprinkled … all through my manuscript. Some places more than others. When I
started looking, I was surprised at how many times I slipped … in. (I took a
few out.)
Spacing is important with….
In going through my words, I
have to decide where to add a space, where to place a comma, a period, or
question mark. (I don’t use many exclamation points.)
I’m still learning. I’m
paying attention to what I’m reading to see how other writers and editors do
it. I’ve come across many … and some…
It amazes me that there’s
always some, new to me, little detail to learn.
I suppose it shouldn’t…, but
it does.
Friday, September 25, 2015
More on Moms
I’ve spent a good deal of my
life trying not to be my mother. It was a shame, because I could have learned a
great deal from her in my adult years. But she was, as I am now, not one to
open up and reveal her innermost thoughts. My insights, such as they are, have
come after she left.
When I wrote about moms before, I
had a saying and a visual image stuck in my mind. Both came from a collage I’d
picked up at an arts & crafts show.
Friday, September 18, 2015
Senior Expo
I went to a senior expo last
month to help out at the information table for the Midwest Writing
Center . My first time at
such an event.
When I got there, the table
was set with the MWC’s banner, informational handouts, and sample books. We were
ready to go.
The red banner had the motto,
Fostering appreciation of the written
word and supporting its creators, in big letters. However, having the
banner draped over a table and partially obscured by piles of leaflets seemed
to present some confusion for people passing by.
Some seniors saw only “the
written word” and got sidetracked into the issue of teaching cursive handwriting
in public schools. They lamented the loss of skills and a younger generation
becoming ill equipped to handle anything but keyboarding.
Some seniors said they only
read books—never wrote them.
Some even commented on the
fact that they couldn’t read very well. One lady described how she had to read
a sentence over and over before she got it.
Well…guess what…I do that all
the time. Have done it forever. I have a longtime friend who also admits to
having to read sentences more than once. She’s one of the most creative artists
I’ve ever known. I guess distraction comes with creativity. It doesn’t mean you
give up trying to read…or write.
For the great majority of
passersby, we were a mild curiosity. The real pleasure came when we established
a connection to someone interested in writing down family history or handing veterans
info on a workshop tailored for their needs.
The MWC’s workshops and
programs have fostered my appreciation of the written word by exposing me to
the work of a wide range of writers and poets. It has supplied me with writing
tools and direction. It provided the all important opportunity for feedback.
I did my best to spread the
good word.
Friday, September 11, 2015
Financing College
You might think this is an
odd post for a blog that’s about writing in general and writing my novel in
particular. I hope to file this topic in the “Things I Got Right” department.
I have my 22-year-old
protagonist as a recent college graduate who wants to go on for an advanced
degree in museum studies. Money is an issue for her. My novel is set in early
2008, a time when money would become an issue for lots of folks, not just
students.
I wanted my protagonist to
think about and handle college financing in a realistic way. To that end I was
fortunate to have some expert advice “in house.”
My husband, Mark Davidsaver,
has produced a website of financial calculators for many years. His most favorite
is one specifically designed for people, parents and students, to calculate
future college debt.
He used his own experience
with navigating federal, state, and college forms. He got feedback from actual
college students and tried to make his calculator as streamlined and as easy to
use as possible.
He’s quite disappointed that
it never caught on. His paycheck withholding calculator remains his most
popular.
So, why mention this now?
Because of a recent
back-to-school column by Katy Williams, a St. Ambrose freshman, for The Dispatch. The title of her column: What I wish I knew before I went to college….
For point #3, she mentioned,
“Money does not go as far as you think it will.”
Her suggestions:
·
Learn to budget
·
Find a part-time
job
·
Avoid having a
car
All solid ideas that have
stood the test of time.
To that list I would suggest
a visit to:
Friday, September 4, 2015
The Fall Novel Workshop
I recently had a meeting with
Aiden Landman of the Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce. He met with me in his
capacity as director of Young Professionals of the Quad Cities. I was
representing the Midwest
Writing Center .
Our purpose: to see how our two organizations, each rich with resources, could
work together and help each other.
As I ran through the list of
MWC’s offerings of workshops and writing opportunities, Aiden indicated he knew
quite a bit about YEW, Young Emerging Writers. This year’s group of teens
recently put together the latest volume of The
Atlas magazine.
I mentioned that I considered
myself a product of the MWC’s workshops and conferences and therefore, while
not a young emerging writer, I could
be considered an old emerging writer.
Not the best joke to make because OEW doesn’t make a good acronym, neither does
MEW, mature emerging writer. Failing
at humor, I moved on.
The MWC has so many irons in
the fire (metaphor alert) it can be difficult to highlight just one.
For instance, the upcoming Fall Novel Workshop with Larry Baker, an Iowa City writer, novelist, and educator.
I took part in the 2012 fall workshop
and I found the six intensive sessions to be the best investment I could have
made for my novel. It gave me a big dose of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop experience for a fraction of the price—and
it was practically delivered to my doorstep.
I was prepared to work and to
accept the constructive critiquing of my beginning 30 pages of manuscript.
Pretty much in line with how
Larry Baker describes his workshop:
“Writing
is not inspiration. Writing is a craft. Writing requires thought, preparation,
perseverance, and a commitment to self-criticism; revision requires a writer to
go through those same steps again.”
I came away with better work.
I built on that work by going through those same steps many, many times. Each editing
pass-through shaping and refining the whole.
Now, I am ready to get my novel out into the world, and it will reflect my
best efforts.
After all, producing one’s
best effort is an ageless goal.
Friday, August 28, 2015
The Fortunate Mistake
I was getting a belated start
on my weekly blog post and stopped to look up the mission statement for the Midwest Writing Center ,
my favorite not-for-profit organization.
I expected to find the
following the simple sentence:
Fostering the appreciation of the written word and
supporting its creators.
Instead, I found a nice photo
of a bunch of kids, probably some middle-schoolers from a recent summer-camp-style
workshop, with this displayed underneath:
Fostering the appreciation of the writeen word and
supporting its creators.
My first thought, “Ugh, typo
alert. They should fix that.”
Then I took a minute, looked
at it again, and began to appreciate the cleverness of that particular
misspelling. Especially in the context of a group of young people.
By entering one T
and two Es instead of two Ts and one E, the word transformed
to something new and exciting. A few misplaced keystrokes produced a superior
caption for that photo.
It put “teen” into the
writing picture.
After all, getting young
folks into writing was the whole
focus of the Midwest Writing Center ’s
YEW Middle School Camp and Young Emerging
Writers Summer Internship Program.
Sometimes typos and other
artistic mistakes have to be appreciated and savored for the subconscious gifts
they are.
“Totally cool,” in oldie
speak.
In other words, “Awesome.”
Friday, August 21, 2015
What It Is NOT About
I tried for a very long time
NOT to make my novel about mothers.
I failed.
There are subplots about
mothers…and daughters…and growing up…and coming to terms with less than perfect
parents.
I also tried to keep Erik
Jansson’s presence to a bare minimum because there were things I didn’t want to
discuss.
Failed at that, too.
But I managed to put off
dealing with him until close to the end of the book.
I wasted a lot of time in the
process of failing to deal with those issues.
The lesson I learned was not
to avoid the difficult topics. Not to try for definitive answers. Just put in
enough information and thought to be enticing.
I think it turned out to be a
lot like one of my favorite Rhymes with
Orange cartoons:
A woman
tries to decide which piece of pizza to buy for lunch. She asks the guy behind
the counter what’s on each.
He
says, “One has pepperoni and one has little bits of truth.”
She
chooses the slice of life.
Friday, August 14, 2015
Write To Read
They say to write what you
want to read.
“They” being the experts
we’re supposed to pay attention to because: a. They’ve been there, b. They’ve
done that.
Well, I’ve spent the better
part of the last five years adding layers of detail and nuance to my novel,
because that’s what I wanted to read. I like books that are: smart, involved,
and complex enough to be interesting.
To that end I’ve tried the
following:
·
My novel doesn’t
deal with one mysterious painting—it deals with three of them.
·
My protagonist
has mommy issues with not one but two parental figures.
Also:
·
She has issues
with a well-meaning uncle.
·
And guy issues.
·
And roommate
issues.
·
And work issues.
·
And finally, she
has to figure out that each of my villains has his own selfish agenda.
I’ve heard “them” say to write
what you know.
After spending a large chunk
of my adult life in one small place, I think I know Bishop Hill. It may not
always present itself in an obvious manner, but the currents swirl around in my
subconscious mind. They surface when I need them, allowing me to built fictitious
characters and events out of bits and pieces of the stuff I remember.
The whole process has been an
education in writing longer works of fiction. I hope the end product will be an
enjoyable read.
A “good read” has been my
goal all along.
Friday, August 7, 2015
Getting Things Right
Recently, I was given a gift,
a nice Facebook gift, when a young friend, who has a really cool job at an art
auction house, connected me to a Christie’s article about paintings.
I took art classes in high
school and college. I did some painting…but not all that much…so I knew writing
about paintings in a mystery novel would be a stretch. I had to pay attention
to books like The Art Forger by B. A.
Shapiro for painting terminology and descriptions of techniques, and carefully
read anything I could find on Olof Krans. Even if I couldn’t directly use the
information, I needed to understand it all.
Now, I had another good
source. The Christie’s article was about the backs of paintings. Yes, the backs.
As museum visitors, we rarely
get to see the backs of paintings. I can only think of one occasion where a
Grant Wood painting was displayed on an easel in the middle of the room leaving
the back exposed.
So, this article was a treat
from the start:
“5 things you can learn from
the back of a painting.
The most overlooked aspect of
an artwork is by no means the least important, as specialist Tom Rooth explains.
“…What
lurks beneath the back of a painting can often be as surprising as what is
marked upon it. Though it’s incredibly rare, there have been cases where
paintings have been found hidden behind other works — sometimes for hundreds of
years, escaping the attention of galleries and auction houses. A loose lining,
or an unusual run of nails can be a clue, though sometimes these secret
masterpieces are only revealed when a work is reframed. It’s impossible to say
why a work is hidden in this way: it may have been a way to store and preserve
a work, or it might simply be that the frame was repurposed.
“Where
reframing would be difficult, improvements in imaging technology have allowed
experts to see through the top layers of a work to any original paintings or
drawings below; it has not been uncommon for penniless artists to reuse
canvases.”
There’s nothing like the
feeling of being totally on target. The “I was sooo right” moment.
I savor it because…it doesn’t
come by all that often.
To read the entire article go to:
Friday, July 31, 2015
Cover Art
When I looked out my kitchen
window on Dec. 23, 2010, I was stunned by what I saw. The sun was coming up and
the sparse clouds had a rose-tinged golden glow. I stared for way too long
before it sunk in that I was looking at a perfectly recognizable cross.
It took even longer for my
brain to kick in with “Get a photo of it.
Now!”
I got several shots before
the cross drifted off toward Galva, leaving me overjoyed with my good luck. I
had some amazing images of something I’d never seen before. When I checked online,
I found my photos held up remarkably well to those taken by other people.
My first thought…I have to
use this in my book.
Easy enough. I worked it into
some early action. It fit perfectly.
Second thought…which came somewhat later…I have to use this for
the cover.
Major problem…when cover
design time came, it’s obvious the photo was taken in December—there’s snow on
the ground—my novel takes place the end of May through early June—college
graduation time—there shouldn’t be any snow.
After sending my cloudy cross
photo to the cover designer, Ken Small, I get a couple of samples to look at.
It’s obvious—there’s snow. Not good.
I spent the weekend with the
problem on the back burner, while my husband and I walked the Bix7.
The easy, best solution
presented itself as I sat around the house recovering: crop the photo. Simplify
the whole thing.
That’s where it stands: blue
morning sky, cloudy cross that’s mostly there, and the title for my mystery—Clouds Over Bishop Hill.
Everything still fitting together
very nicely.
Friday, July 24, 2015
Self-publishing
The time has come. I’m
checking into the world self-publishing.
My writing group meets at the
MWC two Saturdays a month and Lori Perkins and Lyle Ernst, local
representatives of Absolute Publishing Services, came in earlier this year and made
a presentation about the services they could offer.
This last week, I finally got
around to making an appointment to meet with Lori and Lyle to open the
discussion and begin the process.
Even with some idea of what
might happen, I still wasn’t prepared to have to make so many decisions so soon.
Decisions such as:
·
Book size: 5”x
8”, 5 ½”x 8 ½”, 6”x 9”
·
Type: font style
and size
·
Chapters: always
starting on the right, starting left or right
·
Margins: wide,
narrow, in between
·
Photos: color or black-and-white
·
Paper: white, off
white, buff, etc.
·
Copy editing: the
final fine tuning
·
Cover design
I figured there was probably
more, but they wisely waited to spring it on me. That was quite enough for an
initial exposure.
Since I really had no firm
preferences, I did my usual thing…I asked for other people’s opinions. People
who would probably be in my target audience—the infamous “Ladies Who Lunch”
crowd.
I picked out three
representative paperback books and polled my neighbor ladies on book size and
type style. The results were enlightening:
·
Book size: one
vote for each size. Initially not too helpful, but listening to their reasoning
was worthwhile.
·
Font size &
style: they all voted for the same, most readable one. That was good to know we
agreed on a key issue.
With the information I’d
gathered, I sent off my preliminary choices. Lori, of course, turned around and
asked, “Could I give her something for the back of the book? Anything would
do.”
This is no small request.
Back of the book blurbs and info form the hooks that can make a sale. I’ve
been struggling with that for ages. This stuff is important and it took quite
awhile to put together something I didn’t cringe at…too much.
I’m not good at self
promotion. Sad, but that’s what selling books is all about any more. Even those
with a traditional publishing company behind them have to go out and do the
heavy lifting of marketing.
Anyway, the process has begun
and I will see where it leads.
The really good thing about
all this…it feels right.
Now is the time for this
step. And the chances are good that I will have books in hand before Ag Days in
Bishop Hill.
Friday, July 17, 2015
Another Way to Edit?
There are a few ways to read:
·
Slow #1-trying
to savor the experience
·
Slow #2-having
to stop to look up words, or, worse yet, trying to figure out who’s talking
·
Out loud-preferably
to a youngster
·
Fast-speed
reading to get it done and out of the way
Similarly, there are
different ways to edit:
·
Slow & meticulous-trying to stay alert to every possible problem
·
Reading out loud-listening to your words to hear if they flow, or not
·
Reading backwards-trying to trick your brain out of automatically
“filling in the gap” instead of recognizing a mistake
·
Fast and furious-only hitting the high points that need the most attention
I’m not sure this last one is
a valid tool or not. All I can say is that I happened upon it pretty much by
accident and it worked for me.
I had started an editing read
for my novel a couple of weeks ago, but couldn’t quite muster up the momentum
for an in-depth, motivated, and all out thorough editing read.
After all, what I wanted most
was to add a few tidbits of color here and there by using the tips on
sheriffing terminology I’d gotten from talking to Donald Harstad. I also wanted
to add a couple of other small “adjustments” I’d discovered through my
recreational reading. I sometimes come across a word or phrase that sounds just
perfect and wish “I’d thought of that.” I use them when I remember, and I
remember to make them “my own” and not simply copy verbatim.
So, I noticed that as I was
picking up speed for this quick read through the heaviness lifted, it didn’t
feel like a chore any more.
Another odd thing happened. I
was able to pick up some long standing mistakes: like finding a “the” that
should have been a “them.” That shouldn’t have happened. All I can figure is
that the subconscious mind is an amazing tool. It works best when you let it
loose.
In the end, I was able to pleasantly
accomplish a great deal with this fast
and furious approach to editing.
Did I stumble onto something
new?
Probably not.
But it was all new to me.
And that’s what matters most
for me and my novel.
Friday, July 10, 2015
Friday, July 3, 2015
Ladies Who Lunch
I began my experience with
the Midwest Writing
Center by driving into Davenport from Bishop
Hill for the Pen In Hand mini-conferences. I could handle the travel and the
work load of the one day events.
It took me awhile to work my way
up to the three days of the David R. Collins Writers’ Conference, an annual
June event that turned 10 years old this year.
After I had a couple of DRC conferences
under my belt and a nearly finished manuscript in hand, I felt ready to
approach the visiting pros during the pitch sessions for the 2014 conference—a pitch
session being 10 intense minutes of talking up my book to an agent or a
publisher. Of course, that also meant pitching myself as well as my book. Both
would be difficult, but, thanks to working on this blog, I felt reasonably ready.
My first appointment was with
Steve Semken of Ice Cube Press. He runs a small publishing company that looks
for “writing that better explains how we
can best live in the Midwest .”
I didn’t know if he would consider
Bishop Hill part of his Midwestern range, but I needed the practical experience.
Everything went well until
the very end when he asked me one of his stock questions: “Who do you see as being your audience?”
I had pages of notes about
characters, themes, plots and subplots…I had nothing on the marketing aspects
of publishing. It seemed too far away to plan for at that time.
Since I knew I’d be on
display, I tried to dress the part. Instead of my usual jeans and t-shirt, I
had on dress slacks and my best new jacket. And since he caught me by surprise,
I tugged at the shoulders of my nice jacket and ad-libbed: “Ladies who lunch.”
It failed to impress.
Afterward, I spent some time
trying to figure out where it came from. How, in a pinch, I would have thought
of that line.
I had to think back to my
time in Bishop Hill and what the main attraction was during those years. It was
tea rooms.
Bishop Hill in the 80s and
90s built up an impressive supply of tea rooms for family, friends, and other groups.
The day in and day out staple: ladies. So, yes, that was a valid response.
However, it was not complete. It didn’t answer the question of how does one
market to “ladies who lunch?”
I left the issue unexamined
throughout the past year as I went through extensive rewrites and revisions.
Only in the past month have I spent time thinking about how to reach potential
customers. Book buyers are customers.
I signed up for a different
pitch session for the 2015 DRC Writers’ Conference and a requested element for the
presentation was to have a marketing
plan. I fell back on my experience as a craftsperson. I had operated booths
at craft shows & fairs before eventually opening a shop in Bishop Hill. I
brainstormed a page of ideas. Again, I felt ready.
As a bonus feature of the
conference, Steve gave a free workshop at the MWC on what to expect from an
independent press. I attended. I was struck by something he mentioned: He
relied on events and gift shops for selling books.
When I went home to check my
list of marketing ideas there they were—events and gift shops—as my top items.
I was on the right track to
finding those elusive “ladies who lunch.”
Now, I just have to refine my
sales pitch and broaden my range of appeal.
Friday, June 26, 2015
Kenda Burrows Editor
I saw in Monday’s Dispatch
that Kenda Burrows got first place awards for Best Editorial Page as well as
Best Local Editorial from the Illinois Press Association and the Illinois
Associated Press Media Editors Association.
A delightful surprise on my
part.
I went to one of those events
years ago when I was writing for the Galva News. They always read the judges
comments before presenting some very nice plaques. For Kenda the judges said in
part:
“…I hope readers appreciate
what it takes to deliver this much quality local material. The design is not
flashy, but local editorials, columnists and letters to the editor set this
paper apart.”
As a reader I do appreciate
her efforts on the editorial page. It’s always interesting and distinctive.
I especially appreciate her
willingness to stick her neck out and give unknown and inexperienced columnists
a chance to write on a new and higher level. She did that for me.
I was chosen to be part of a
group of guest columnists in 2008 thanks to then governor Rod Blagojevich. He
went out of his way to give me a lot of material to work with by closing down
state historic sites. Since Bishop Hill had three sites within its tiny village
limits, all I had to do was walk from shop to shop and listen to the reactions.
I wrote them up, gave the piece a positive twist, and ended with a satirical
“Thank you, Governor, for that much.” I had a killer entry.
But winning was the easy
part. I had to follow up with other columns. I had to deal with the deadlines.
I had to get used to expressing my opinions. I had to write in the first
person. Those things did not come easy to me at that point in my writing
career.
Working with Kenda on those
columns became an invaluable experience in my development as a writer. I will
always appreciate her and the Dispatch.
Friday, June 19, 2015
Donald Harstad on Writing
I met up with Donald Harstad
in the second floor lounge of the St. Ambrose
library. He had been invited to talk about writing and being an author. His
specialty is crime fiction and police procedurals set in northeast Iowa .
He sat on a library table and
regaled us with a life story that began in Iowa, went to Hollywood, and then
returned to Iowa when Hollywood got too strange, too drugged out, and, thanks
to Charles Manson, too dangerous to raise his young daughter.
He happened upon a career in
law enforcement with his return to Elkader.
His writing career got a kick
start when, without warning, he was forced to take earned vacation time. It was
a use it or lose it situation that left him home alone. His solution was to write
a book—in eleven days.
Yes…eleven…long…coffee-fueled days. He used a Commodore 64 computer and 9-dot
matrix printer to produce his first book. It was difficult to read and probably
would have gone no further if his sister hadn’t finagled a way to get it retyped
and distributed among her Hollywood friends
and contacts. His lucky break came when an agent took an interest.
Millions of books later…I get to sit in the St. Ambrose library
and listen to his advice:
·
Find out what you
do well and make it work for you.
·
Stay sober, get
some sleep, and be alert.
·
Write 1-3,000
words a day.
·
Begin the next day
with a quick edit and then go on.
·
Don’t trip the
reader’s “eye.” Keep the writing smooth.
·
Don’t edit
dialog. Keep it realistic and brief.
·
Know what people
are like.
·
Have your cops
keep their fingers beside the trigger and the gun pointed down.
·
Cops will be all
business on the job. No one throws up at a crime scene.
·
Cops will not use jargon like “perp,” that’s for
wannabe’s. Real cops are thinking and therefore speaking in terms of the
reports they’ll have to write up at the end of their shifts.
·
Ditch the agent
who’s looking out for himself first.
·
If you have a
contract with Double Day—don’t screw it up by going with an independent!
·
London is a great place to stage a murder scene.
·
If you find
yourself signing books at the same table Charles Dickens used—have someone take a photo!
His second book took 30-40
days to write. Must have had something to do with all that training writing all
those police reports. I can only wish for that kind of speed.
·
A final bit of
Harstad advice comes by way of John le Carré: “Strive to write interesting
shit.”
That motto hangs on his
office wall above a more modern computer.
Sounds like good advice to
me. Can’t wait to read that first book.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)