Shedding Secrets

After a week of rewrites: I’m done! I’m happy! (I’m mega relieved!)

I finished within the time limit I set. (Pretty much….)

It feels good to be finished and have it really FEEL finished. (This time.)

I’m happy with the results … more than the other times I thought I was finished. (YES!)

The thing that surprised me the most was how well the basic core, or structure, of my book held together. I changed a character, added lots of information, and generally tried to clear things up in the storyline. (Hopefully no more loose ends.)

Basically, I was getting rid of the secrets my characters were hiding from each other. (And the reader.)

Sad part: I had to cut out my biggest Easter egg. (Cute or not, I was told it was too confusing.)  

It’s not all sad … I still have the tomato shirt. (Providing its share of color.)

Bonus: I now know the difference between recreation and re-creation. (Hyphens are sometimes sooo important.)

P.S. Since I was late last week, I will be posting early this week. (Providing balance to the blog life.)

Reading OUTLOUD

Last week I created a new character to replace a problematic one.

This week I began to implement all the changes that come with inserting the new guy into my story. Sort of like introducing him to the neighborhood and see if he makes friends.

Well, maybe not friends, but he does have to fit into the scheme of things and behave himself and accomplish the mission. The mission: to clarify and connect and reveal the motives behind the actions of the other characters. And let’s not forget the plot. I have been guilty of leaving too much to vague innuendo. Some of that came from years of tip-toeing around the real Erik Jansson. Some comes from this being my first novel—I’ve rewritten it so many times that I wonder if it is still my first novel. I suppose that it always will be the first until it is officially finished.

It has taken time and a few different attempts at organization to actually get started with the writing. First up: I made a list of the names I would use with the Microsoft Word editing feature “Find.” Yes, I needed a list because changing one name meant I had to change another for continuity. I used my list to search for and change whole names and partial names and to leave one name unchanged.

Secondly, I made a list of the chapters I thought needed changing. I came up with 12 chapters out of 40. My plan at that point was to make the changes and then go through the manuscript from the beginning and smooth things out. I would read every word out loud because it does work to speak and listen and not give the brain a chance to automatically fill in the gaps and gloss over the mistakes.

So, I had a plan but I couldn’t get myself started. The clock was ticking. People were waiting for me. In an effort to get going, I tried starting from the end in the hope that working backward would make the beginning easier. No luck.

I ended up at the beginning and reading every word out loud … making changes along the way working from a list of my goals.

I’ve been amazed at the kind of things I’ve found so far: a name change that was missed, a present tense verb that had to be past tense, a third person pronoun that should have been first person, a misspelling that was also missed by a “search.” Reading the work out loud was definitely one of my better decisions.

Some days went better than others, and after a couple of really good days I confidently announced that I would make my deadline of Monday. I am on track to finish.

However, my weekly blog post had to wait a day.

Goodbye to Erik Jansson

My parting with Erik Jansson was stressful—but necessary—and easy thanks to the “find” feature in my word document menu. I was able to locate all versions of Jansson and replace it with the name of my new character.

You see, the real Erik Jansson was too tied up with my fictionalized guy. Too many times I found myself in the awkward position of answering questions and explaining facts about the historical Jansson or Janson. (He dropped an s after coming to America.) This became a problem because I’m not an expert on the real Jansson or Janson.

I simply needed a heavy, someone who could provide a reason for a painting to be hidden for 90 years or so.

So enter Karl Hemson. A brand-new guy with a backstory completely made up by me. I know where he’s been, what he’s up to, and why he wanted to remain incognito. He can be good or bad as needed and not ruffle any feathers.

Coming up with names has always been a problem for me. I settled on Karl Hemson for the following reasons: Hem in Swedish means home, I like the idea of a home boy, a favorite son so to speak; the name Karl is because I simply liked the K; also hem reminds me of a song that Morris Nelson used to sing at the VASA smörgåsbords.

Hemson and Jansson will probably have to briefly cross paths in Sweden. And Hemson’s journey to America will have to be similar. After all, he does end up in Bishop Hill. That doesn’t change.

Bonus: Adding Hemson should make a change in the ending easier and more natural.

So, I have some work to do.

More Scrutiny, More Revisions

Author and mentor Susan Carroll has done a masterful job with supplying content editing for my manuscript, Clouds Over Bishop Hill.

Carroll has given me a sorely needed outsider’s perspective.

Carroll’s comments/questions have sent me off into bouts of deep research and the creation of a brand-new character.

Carroll has led me to axe a ton of personal pronouns. (In case you hadn’t noticed, there’s been a lack of “she” used here.)

All this is great and good because I needed to do that research on the Pietism Movement, and the new character solved a problem that had always left me with a vague feeling of squeamishness.

Bonus feature: When I finished writing up the background info and backstory for this new guy, I discovered what really looked like a synopsis for another book. A book that would make a nice prequel to what I’ve got now. The new story might come out a tad bit on the romantic side, but that’s not a bad thing. I just have to do the work.

The most practical lesson I’ve learned so far from Carroll’s edits to my manuscript is that getting rid of “he, she, it, they, and them” helps the reader keep track of things like action and plot development. Good stuff. A lost reader can’t be a happy reader.

So, again, I’m still learning and I’m very grateful to Susan Carroll for her help to keep me on course to a (hopefully) successful novel.

P.S. Susan Carroll did NOT edit this post. Any mistakes are mine.

Trust the Process

I’ve read recently that you have to “trust the process.”

For me, it’s difficult to trust something that’s slow, convoluted, and sporadic. That seems to characterize my process.

I’ve had great news—I have a publisher—with the contract will come another round of content editing. I welcome it in that I want my work to be its best. However, I don’t like the feeling of inadequacy, like what I’ve got so far isn’t good enough. I don’t mind changes and improvements. I just don’t want to start over. I like how my protagonist has unfolded and discovered her strengths. It has meaning for me. But does it fit the exact formula for a cozy mystery? Usually the main character arrives on scene fully formed. She or he faces down conflicts and surmounts obstacles, their circumstances change, so do they, but not enough to create a whole new persona. They were whole to start with. Not with my new adult. She’s still coming into being.

I also began to write my version of a stump speech. What I want to say when I try to defend myself to the possible backlash. Stories need conflict, something to get things moving. I picked one that will probably offend a few people. I knew that, but now the time will come where I’ll have to tell real people just why I did it. Talk about being out of ones’ comfort zone.

In writing that speech, I realized I’d missed the boat in actually stating one of my main themes. One sentence doesn’t cut it. I had to go back in and fix this before the manuscript went off to the new editor.

I also have more feedback from another trusted source. I haven’t been through all of it. I know I have to, but I keep putting it off. I AM a big chicken and an expert procrastinator.

Times up. I have to dive back in and make the changes. Again, it is a relief to get going, to see that everything isn’t as bad as I might have imagined. It just needs to be BETTER.

For me, that’s the process.

Back Cover Blues

Late last year, during a time when I considered self-publishing my only option, I forged ahead and designed the cover for my book. I had my cloud photo, a general idea of what I wanted on the front, and not much else. I certainly didn’t have the all important text for the back of the book.

“It’s such an important thing-the whole cover (front and back) can sell a book or make a buyer walk away from it.”

Lori Perkins, Absolute Publishing Services

First of all, I have to admit that I never really had an outline to guide my writing. I spent most of my time being a “pantser” as in one who writes by the seat of their pants. As a process, it gets kind of messy, so I had to stop and make a list of what each chapter was about. I found it a very useful for tracking who was doing what, where, and when. It was also very useful when the time came to write a synopsis for my agent query letters.

I took my list and wrote out the story as it focused on six main characters. It took up far too many pages. I then condensed it down to five pages. Then three pages. Then to less than two pages.

For my back cover, I reduced the essence to less than 200 words. I tried to make it interesting. Give it a hook. But I was never sure if I really succeeded. Would I buy this book?

So, I’ve been fiddling with the back cover text ever since then.

Every time I got a new piece of advice, I went in to incorporate it into what I already had. But it never completely worked.

Every time I tried for a complete rewrite I ultimately found it lacking. My original kept holding its own. I guess I managed to find a pretty good feel for the back cover months ago.

It kind of surprises me. I’m happy, but I still plan to ask for second opinions before I make the final decision.

How Many Emails Does it Take…?

I started out with the free version of FundsforWriters around three years ago. Two years ago I bumped myself up to TOTAL FundsforWriters, the paid professional version of Hope Clark’s “Tips and Tools for serious writers to advance their careers.”

                                                                               

Recently, when my annual subscription came due I re-upped by buying Edisto Jinx. The book purchase served two purposes: I paid for my next year of info on competitions, grants, and freelancing opportunities (I’m currently not looking for an agent or publisher); and I got the chance to check out how she handled the second book in her new series.

I read the book, wrote a review, and was happy.

On March 31: I noticed one of her extra emails announcing “Free training to sell more books.” I’m sure I read it. However, I was not enticed enough to go further.

On April 4: I received another email “Reminder to register for free training to sell more books.” I read this one, too. The big difference … this one included a FREEBIE.

I learned the value of giving away free stuff from former jobs in the jewelry industry. Customers really appreciated getting small gifts, usually a service or something inexpensive. They came back. They became loyal.

The freebie included in the second email was a copywriting sample by Bryan Cohen—a before and after comparison of how to punch up your back cover pitch to readers. For me, that was the all important hook. I reread that part three times. Unfortunately, I didn’t read the rest of the email as carefully, so by the time I finally clicked through to the webinar it had already started. I didn’t try to join in. My loss for being tardy. So it goes. Or so I thought.

On April 7: Another email arrived “Missed the seminar yesterday? Get your replay….”

I listened. I learned a lot. I connected to usable ideas.

For one thing, I have a new appreciation for email contacts and their use in marketing. In my own real world case it took the equivalent of FIVE emails to spur me into action. Pretty darn close to what Bryan Cohen said it would take.

Many thanks to Hope Clark for making this bonus feature available. I will certainly try to read her next email a little more carefully.